Only a False Prophet could speak such words (Part 1)


God has warned us in His Holy Scriptures:

“A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth that which is evil. For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh” (Lk 6:45).

“Be not deceived, God is not mocked” (Gal 6:7).

“And he opened his mouth unto blasphemies against God” (Apoc 13:6)…

For fools speak folly, and their minds plot iniquity: to practice ungodliness,
to utter error concerning the Lord, to leave the craving of the hungry unsatisfied, and to deprive the thirsty of drink.7 The villainies of villains are evil; they devise wicked devices to ruin the poor with lying words, even when the plea of the needy is right
”.( Isaiah 32:6-7)

“And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon.” (Rev.13:11)

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”  (Matthew 7:15)

What is a false prophet?

A prophet is one who speaks to us God’s word. A “false” prophet speaks God’s word – but it is false: twisted, misquoted; falsities inserted, etc.

A false prophet speaks true words of God at times, but when it suits him, he speaks words that are not from God, but implies, or says that they are. He is two-faced. He says what people want to hear. He is a “Janus” or Janus-faced.

Jesus described false prophets as “wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Revelation describes the false prophet as having 2 horns like a lamb. (See Rev. 13:11 above) The Mitre the pope wears can signify the “2 horns”.

Jesus tells us we will know them by their fruits. Some of them are listed below:

The words of the False Prophet belie his true identity:

Other public acts of blasphemy against God or the Saints include his



  • 2016 : “First, we have Francis accusing John the Baptist of “doubt, or lack of faith, in Matthew 11: Although John was great, strong, secure in his vocation, “he still had dark moments,” he had his doubts,” said Francis. In fact, John began to doubt in prison, even though he had baptized Jesus, “because he was a Saviour that was not as he had imagined him.” (

·       The Blessed Virgin Mary commits mortal sin at the foot of the cross, accusing God the Father of deception “Lies! I Was Cheated” –– Pope Francis’ Daring Statement About Mary at Domus Santae Marthae on the 20 December, 2013 .  See:


  • Bergoglio claims Judas was repentant and victimized.

Bergoglio earlier this week  (April 2016) delivered a sermon at Casa Santa Marta in which he called Judas Iscariot a poor, repentant man, victimized and driven to suicide by unmerciful lovers of the law”. The writer comments: “This stunning attempt to rehabilitate Judas Iscariot, the greatest, most wicked traitor in history and despairing self-murderer, is beyond unprecedented.  It reeks of supernatural evil.” See: (  )


  • Only a false prophet would contradict the Catholic Church teaching on “hell”: On November 6, 2016, in a midday address after the Angelus in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Francis suggested that everyone goes to heaven. He said: “The ‘children of heaven and resurrection’ are not a privileged few, but they are all men and all women, because the salvation brought by Jesus is for everyone.”

In an interview published in the La Stampa on December 31, 2013, he said: “Never fear the final judgment, because Christ will always be at our side.”

Likewise, in Amoris Laetitia (297), Pope Francis wrote: No one can be condemned forever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel!” See:

  • A true pope would not make fun of any religious orders, let alone those who are attracting many vocations. or use the phrase “superstar” or “postmistress” in reference to the Blessed Virgin.

In referring to religious orders, he said that he worries because  “The Spirit does not follow the logic of human success.” He denounced them as “Pelagians,” who want a return to asceticism and penance, “soldiers who seem ready to do anything for the defense of faith and morality, and then some scandal emerges involving the founder [male or female].”


  • Proselytism is solemn nonsense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us.

A true Pope would commend to us Jesus’ words“Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15). Pope Paul VI affirmed in his letter On Evangelization in the Modern World: “We wish to confirm once more that the task of evangelizing all people constitutes the essential mission of the Church” (14). Evangelization is at the very heart of what it means to be followers of the Lord.

  • The false prophet said:I believe in God, not in a Catholic god”.


  • He says: “:We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods.” And also says: “the most urgent problem that the Church is facing is youth unemployment and the loneliness of the old. “


  • If the Christian is a restorationist, a legalist, if he wants everything clear and safe, then he will find nothing. Compare this with Pope Benedict XVI: “Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the church, is often labeled today as a fundamentalism. … Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and ‘swept along by every wind of teaching,’ looks like the only attitude acceptable to today’s standards.”




  • For example, when the Bishop of Rome preached at the Domus Santae Martae in May 2013, he said in a homily:  “We must meet one another doing good. ‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’  But do good: we will meet one another there.”  By “there,” he meant heaven.  In other words, atheists can go to heaven by doing good works. This is clearly error. See:

See Part 2 tomorrow: some clues on how to  discern false prophets.

Is the Church still ‘One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic’?



(Please note that the  parts written in brown font  and the headings are my own additions. More examples and evidence can be seen if you follow the links in the text to the original articles.)

Is the Church still “ONE” under this pontificate?

The oneness or unity of the Church in her submission to Christ as head, in her doctrinal integrity, and in her confession of one faith has been obscured and undermined in various ways under Francis’ pontificate:

  • He has called for a “decentralized” Church, and allowed individual bishops’ groups to determine for their own “regional” churches what is moral and right. In this way, it is supposedly permissible for adulterers to receive Holy Communion in Germany while across the border in Poland it is gravely sinful.

(Ven. Archbishop Fulton Sheen in 1950 said “There will be a counterfeit church. Christ’s Church will be one. And the False Prophet will create the other. The false church will be worldly, ecumenical, and global. It will be a loose federation of churches…”)

 (Our Lady of Akita, 13h Oct. 1973) 

  • He has refused to answer Church leaders earnestly begging for clarity on points of contention.

The Dubia by the 4 Cardinals presented to Pope Francis in private  by Cardinals Burke, Brandmüller, Burke, Caffarra and Meisner for the Dubia they submitted to Pope Francis in September 201.6 When there was no answer, these Dubia were made public in December, 2016

  • He has allowed Catholic doctrine to be minimized in the name of religious “dialogue” with other Christian denominations with a history of hostility towards Catholic doctrine on marriage, the Eucharist, and the papacy. Under his leadership, the Vatican has even hailed Luther, the founder of Protestantism, as a “witness to the gospel.”

(See 1 Timothy4: 1-2: “ …in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared.”)

Is the Church still “HOLY” under this pontificate?

The holiness and sacred reality of the Church as the bride of Christ has been obscured and undermined in various ways under Francis’ pontificate:

  • His writings have been used by those closest to him to promote evil practices such as adultery and fornication as legitimate moral choices. (And Sodomy ?)
  • His writings have also been used to defend the sacrilegious practice of giving Holy Communion to those living in objective grave sin (here, here, here, and here). Bishops and cardinals have defended this sacrilegious practice based on the Pope’s own arguments in Amoris Laetitia that emphasize “pastoral care” and “mercy” to the detriment of doctrine and truth.

“…Last year Francis said that cohabitating couples are in a “real marriage” and receive the grace of the Sacrament. “I’ve seen a lot of fidelity in these cohabitations, and I am sure that this is a real marriage, they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity,” he said at that time.”

See whole article at:

  • He has denounced “restorationist” orders bursting with young people and has destroyed one traditional order.

 ROME, February 9, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has stated that the rise of new religious institutes that attract numerous religious vocations “worries” him because they often promote “rigidity. Francis denounced new traditional religious orders as “Pelagians,” who want a return to asceticism and penance.

Also the dismantling of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate (a thriving order, growing in numbers) because of an internal dispute over the use of the Traditional Latin Mass. This stands in opposition to the many religious orders riddled with major issues such as dissent, sexual abuse, rampant homosexuality for the last few decades and still remain comparatively untouched by Church authorities.

  • He has resisted the traditional Latin Mass and called the young people who love it “rigid.”
  • He has accused Christians of “cowardliness who zealously follow the Ten Commandments.
  • He has consistently used coarse and degrading language to criticize and vilify those with whom he disagrees (here, here, and here).
  • He has allowed St. Peter’s Basilica, a sacred Church building, to be desecrated by an occult light show projected on its facade. This occurred on 8th December, Feast of the Immaculate Conception, and was in celebration of his latest ‘encyclical’ ‘Laudate Si’ . New Age images abounded including pagan gods and goddesses.

Is the Church still “Catholic” under this pontificate?

The Catholicity or universal mission of the Church to ceaselessly toil for the salvation of souls has been obscured and undermined in various ways under Francis’ pontificate:

Is the Church still “Apostolic” under this pontificate?

The apostolicity of the Church where the deposit of faith is authentically handed down from the apostles through their successors the bishops and cardinals has been obscured and undermined in various ways under Francis’ pontificate:

Read the original and complete article at:

Prophecies fulfilled – Apostolic Exhortations – Twisting the Truth:


Error and Truth – Fp’s Apostolic exhortations

 Twisting the Truth (prophecy)

“The division between the loyal followers, those who accept My Father’s Book, the Most Holy Bible, and those who want to change the Truth, is about to become wider. One half will not deviate from the Truth. The other half will twist the Truth. They will do this to suit their own political and personal motivations, which will be hidden behind a couched language. The Truth will soon be declared to be a lie and God will be accorded the blame.”  (B of T: November 21, 2012 )

In FP’s apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia

  • Footnote 351 (Amoris laetitia‘s) granted permission for unrepentant adulterers to commit sacrilege at Mass
  • He also conveniently failed to quote St. John Paul’s Familiaris consortio 84 which explicitly upholds Christ’s commandment forbidding Communion for purportedly remarried adulterers,
  • Amoris laetitia‘s Footnote 329 rips the Second Vatican Council’s Gaudium et spes 51 (concerning temporary abstinence from marital relations) completely out of context in order to argue that “doing it for the children” might mitigate the mortal sin of adultery.

In his previous apostolic exhortation Evangelium Gaudium no. 161,

  • FP claimed that Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyselfis the first and greatest commandment thereby putting human beings and our human relationships above God and our obligation to worship Him in spirit and in truth. Contrary to what Pope Francis claims, Jesus, as all faithful Catholics know, says the first and greatest commandment is “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy might, etc.,” while love of neighbor is the second greatest commandment.

 (This makes all the difference in the world — and the Pope’s reversal of these commandments, putting mere mortals ahead of God, seems to explain all his actions and emphases since his election to the See of St. Peter, beginning with his ultra vires and scandalous washing of the feet of women, pagans, and transsexuals on Holy Thursday.)

  • Evangelium Gaudium, falsifies Patristic doctrine in Footnote 51, which provides quotes from the Church Fathers in support of the statement in
  • Evangelium Gaudium 47, “The Eucharist, although it is the fullness of sacramental life, is not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak.”

That sentence from EG no. 47, standing alone, is true.  But in light of subsequent actions and utterances of the Pope and numerous other bishops and cardinals, there is much more going on there …I think it now should be clear the Pope in EG no. 47 telegraphed his intention to impose upon the Church the approval of giving Communion not only to adulterers but to anyone who is impenitent or even those who lack the saving Catholic faith of Christ.  This is indicated by the way the teachings of the Church Fathers are treated in

  • Footnote 51 of Evangelium Gaudium.

According to francis, the great doctor St. Ambrose of Milan in his De Sacramentis (On the Mysteries) said:

“I must receive it always, so that it may always forgive my sins. If I sin continually, I must always have a remedy.”

Taken alone, this could sound like a scandalous encouragement to presumptuous or sacrilegious reception of Holy Communion, as if receiving the Sacrament of the Eucharist removes mortal sin without any need for recourse to the Sacrament of Penance (contrary to the infallible, permanently binding dogma of the Council of Trent).

Did St. Ambrose really say, “I must receive it always”?  Did he think it’s wrong to refrain from Communion at Mass, that reception of Communion when at Mass is obligatory?

No, he didn’t think that, nor did he say, “I must receive it always,” nor, “I must always have a remedy.”  Evangelium Gaudium Footnote 51 not only takes the great Milanese doctor’s words out of context, but it also mistranslates them.

 Here’s the passage in context, and correctly translated (emphasis added):

“Therefore as often as thou receivest—what saith the Apostle to thee?—as often as we receive, we show the Lord’s death; if we show his death, we show remission of sins. If, as often as blood is poured forth, it is poured for remission of sins, [then] I ought always to receive it, that my sins may always be forgiven me. I, who am always sinning, ought always to have a remedy.”

See original article at:




Is PF about to Change the Mass and fulfill yet another Prophecy?

The Prophecy:

The change in the format of the Mass will soon be presented in My Church.

My dearly beloved daughter, you must ignore the hatred which is spilling out of the mouths of those who claim to be holy people and loyal followers of My dearly beloved Mother. Know that the hatred, which will be shown against you, will be worse than any other prophet, who came before you.

I tell you this not to frighten you, but only so that you will accept this fact and then ignore the wickedness. Whenever the Presence of God is made known amongst men, it will always produce a vicious reaction from the beast, who will work through others to deny the Word of God.

My daughter, the change in the format of the Mass will soon be presented in My Church. It will be very confusing and for many, they will fail to see the lies, which will be presented within the new prayers. My Presence will be denounced in the most subtle of ways, but those who follow the new format, in which My True Presence will be denied, will be unable to perform the Sacrifice to God in the way it must be. My daughter, this one revelation will result in your being despised, but you must know that this has been foretold. My followers will be told that Holy Communion is about all people – everywhere – uniting as one, to show love to one another. Slowly, but surely, the Holy Mass will no longer be about My Holy Sacrifice. Instead the ceremony will be created to pay homage to man and you will be misled into witnessing a confrontation before My Holy Altars and all the tabernacles in the world.

The day when the daily sacrifices will cease is not far away. Know that I come to warn you of this now, so that you will not starve. When you are deprived of My Presence, you will be empty of My Spirit and you will find it difficult to remain close to Me.

The words which will be used to deceive you will include the phrase “for the good of all – for the unification of all God’s children.” The Mass will take on a new meaning. Forgotten will be My Death on the Cross and all the reasons for it will be re-defined. Remember on that day, My Words to you now. Accept the substitution and My Presence will disappear. I will be with you, but it will not be My Body which you will partake of.

To those who do not believe in the wicked plan, which has already been created, in order to wipe out all traces of Me, I say this now. When I Am gone, will you seek Me out? When My Holy Eucharist is defiled, will you make excuses for those responsible? Or will you follow Me and listen to the Truth when you are surrounded by lies.

The choice will be yours.

Your Jesus

The article:

Intercommunion is How the Abomination of Desolation will be Marketed

“Drafts from Santa Marta intercommunion Part II: if the smoke of Satan is really in the Vatican” by Fra Cristoforo


[Part 2 of a computer translated Italian website article. Part 1 is here.]

“Drafts from Santa Marta intercommunion Part II: if the smoke of Satan is really in the Vatican” by Fra Cristoforo

And ‘now it is known, as already hinted, the news of a “commission” reserved, commissioned by Bergoglio, to review the Catholic Mass.
The intent, as I said is to unify the rites so as to create an ‘inter-communion with the Lutherans. God only knows what will happen.
Because now the demolition is taking place.

Also I wrote that this group participate obviously Lutherans and Anglicans. Several times the Bishop of Rome, in his speeches for the 500th anniversary of the Lutheran Reformation, went saying he hopes for “new paths” of unification. And these new routes, umma umma has already put them in place.
Meanwhile there is to say that by this committee (chaired by the Archbishop Arthur Roche, Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship) was ousted listen, listen-really the prefect, Cardinal Sarah.

But these things now in Santa Marta are the order of the day. Just think of the commissioner of the Order of Malta. A scandal. Msgr. Becciu become commissioner and Cardinal Burke is there like a statue.
We talk about the CEI (Italian Episcopal Conference)?
The CEI (for want of Bergoglio), the President, Cardinal Bagnasco, you know how important? Counts as the ace of clubs when Trump’s money. Who of course holds the strings of all is the Secretary, Mons. Nunzio Galantino
(What the last World Youth Day said that Sodom was saved thanks to Abraham’s prayer. And so she does not even know the Bible).

The news that I, as some of my confidential sources, is that the Cardinal Sarah, a few months time, will be deposed from his role as Prefect. Because he was considered “too conservative.” Who will take his place precisely Secretary: Archbishop Arthur Roche.

If you want some information on this English archbishop read here:
( ) .. and
Also here
( ).

So you realize who we’re talking about. Who has ideas about the liturgy and above all moral.

Why Bergoglio wanted at all “clear” cost communion for divorced and remarried? The reason is not simply “to meet the couples in difficulty” etc. …
But because his ultimate intention ‘IS TO REFORM THE MASS IN A WAY WHICH celebrate it together CHRISTIANS OF OTHER CONFESSIONS.
Obviously it will be compromised “Eucharistic Consecration”. It is already known the news that on March 13 next in St. Peter’s Basilica Anglicans celebrate their liturgy with Catholic ministers.
( Http:// ).
And ‘as if we wanted to have to get used to the idea.

My source tells me that Bergoglio in a hurry to accomplish this massacre. And in Santa Marta lately there is a bustle of pastors of other denominations, along with Roche.
In order to implement this evil, you will have to cut some heads (INCLUDING, SHORT EVEN THAT OF CARDINAL SARAH).

It seems that even in social occasions in Santa Marta is a continuous teasing to those who now tries to save the TRUE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE. On the fact of change of the Mass, dear readers, put his soul in peace. The work has already begun. But not only “theological.” Pure ‘psychological’ ones. Targeted to make us get used to the idea already. Think: the Bishop of Rome has enthroned the Luther statue in the Vatican, the day of Our Lady of Fatima and no priest has dared to breathe
( -h / ).

The “secrets” that I get, unfortunately, are real.
Time will show them. And if nobody stops this massacre, perhaps thinking “but so it will not happen”, we find ourselves really no longer the Holy Mass, the Holy Sacrifice of Christ, but the “holy memory.”
They would like to call it something like this.

You understand the gravity of this. It seems the situation is “unrealistic”. But know that it is a PLAN ALREADY WELL DEFINED. And all demolitions of Bergoglio, the first day of his pontificate, had ONLY THIS END.

Part 1 of the same warning about the plans to reform the Liturgy can be found here and includes links to other sources:



Credit for articles goes to and Fra Cristoforo who created the original article in Italian.  Also to the website for the copy of the prophecy given in the Book of Truth.



“Obeying the Ten Commandments paralyzes you!” (False Prophet)


In another in a long stream of apparent attacks on his critics, Pope Francis gave a homily last week accusing Christians who avoid taking risks out of concern for the Ten Commandments as suffering from “cowardliness,” warning that such people become “paralyzed” and unable to “go forward.”

‘Not taking risks, please, no… prudence

Obeying all the commandments, all of them…,’”
“Yes, it’s true, but this paralyzes you …  
(February 1, 2017 (

I’ve been thinking about this latest evil stupidity … and the ramifications.

First of all, I couldn’t make sense of it because its chaosof course… so I shouldn’t be trying. Secondly I thought, “Imagine each of commandments in turn… and what he is therefore proposing by this ‘false courage’ to supposedly make us ‘go forward’ while breaking commandments’!

The Ten Commandments, in order10-cm

( )

  1. “I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me.”

This commandment forbids idolatry, the worship of false gods and goddesses, and it excludes polytheism, the belief in many gods, insisting instead on monotheism, the belief in one God. This commandment forbids making golden calves, building temples to Isis, and worshipping statues of Caesar, for example. 

But according to the FP who overrides Divine Law, we should be prudent in this. Go worship in a Moslem temple today. Yoga, Reiki? All good. Recognise other religious leaders as honouring God t00. Promote and honour heretics because God wasn’t all that jealous and didn’t really mean it. He meant us to be prudent and just do it every other day!!

  1. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”

The faithful are required to honour the name of God. It makes sense that if you’re to love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, then you’re naturally to respect the name of God with equal passion and vigor.

But the Fp might say: “What’s a little slip every now and then? Eh? Especially in Italian… Wear those blasphemous T shirts too. What’s the harm, eh? Don’t reflect on this too much in your life as it might make you confined’ in speech and action. Maybe just don’t do it in church on Sunday.”

  1. “Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.”

The Lord God made the seventh day, a day of holy rest. Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox Christians go to church on Sunday, treating it as the Lord’s Day to honor the day Christ rose from the dead. 

The FP  says, “Best to be prudent about that. The World Peace Soccer Match is a good one or any soccer match because sports leads us to God. I would discern whether its right for you today. As long as YOU are at peace with that decision.”

  1. “Honour thy father and mother.”

This commandment obliges the faithful to show respect for their parents — as children and adults. Children must obey their parents, and adults must respect and see to the care of their parents, when they become old and infirm. They should not do anything to dishonour their parents or bring blame upon them. 

Well, you guessed it, the FP says, “Its all optional and depends how you see it. Maybe euthanasia is the prudent way to honour them in old age. Think hard about that one. Also honour them by breaking a few commands because it actually helps them in their old fashioned rigidity’. Don’t be paralysed over itIt frees them of hang ups.”

5.“Thou shalt not kill.”

…Unless its through population control programs or contraceptive abortifacents for nuns in the Congo or a loved one needing Euthanasia. Maybe it means babies in the womb, in some circumstances (because you can’t be too confined, you have to be prudent with the Commandments) but don’t worry, we will make absolution quick, easy and painless– you don’t even have to confess!  Also “Do not kill” doesn’t strictly apply if you’re a Moslem. In that case you are just obeying your religion’s divine commands which is obviously, more prudent. And if a Moslem comes at you with a machete, let him into the church. Accompany him and do some dialogue- if you live long enough.”

The better translation from the Hebrew would be “Thou shalt not murder” — a subtle distinction but an important one to the Church. Killing an innocent person is considered murder. Killing an unjust aggressor to preserve your own life is still killing, but it isn’t considered murder or immoral. 

Exactly who the unjust aggressors are in Francis’ eyes? Traditionalists! Worst type of people. 

  1. “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”

The sixth and ninth commandments honor human sexuality. This commandment forbids the actual, physical act of having immoral sexual activity, specifically adultery, which is sex with someone else’s spouse or a spouse cheating on their partner. This commandment also includes fornication, which is sex between unmarried people, prostitution, pornography, homosexual activity, masturbation, group sex, rape, incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and necrophilia.

I don’t think I need to comment on that. We all know what the FP thinks about Sacramental marriage, living together and having a few babies first, adultery, chastity and re-marriage without annulment. Be prudent in not keeping that Commandment!!! Really the majority of marriages are invalid today- if you can convince yourself of that. Anyway they must not be really Divine Commands but are more like flexible guidelines.

  1. “Thou shalt not steal.”

The seventh and tenth commandments focus on respecting and honoring the possessions of others. This commandment forbids the act of taking someone else’s property. The Catholic Church believes that this commandment also denounces cheating people of their money or property.

…Unless you are Francis stealing the Crucifix from the coffin of someone you admired. See Cardinal Pell went a little too far in uncovering and trying to prevent corruption in the Vatican Finances dept. Then you should not be so worried about that commandment. We shouldn’t be so confined and judgmental in our view.

  1. “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

The Eighth Commandment condemns lying. Because God is regarded as the author of all truth, the Church believes that humans are obligated to honor the truth. The most obvious way to fulfill this commandment is not to lie — intentionally deceive another by speaking a falsehood.

Francis would never speak a falsehood, would he? He wouldn’t twist the truth, would he? Oh, but it doesn’t matter-that’s right, we can’t follow all the Commandments exactly! Not all the time! Don’t strive for that.

  1. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife.”

The Ninth Commandment forbids the intentional desire and longing for immoral sexuality. To sin in the heart, Jesus says, is to lust after a woman or a man in your heart with the desire and will to have immoral sex with them. Just as human life is a gift from God and needs to be respected, defended, and protected, so, too, is human sexuality. Catholicism regards human sexuality as a divine gift, so it’s considered sacred in the proper context — marriage. 

BUT, says FP, it must be OK if you consider them your wife, in some sort of way (or partner, re-partner)..that will fix that one! Just read AL to find out more. If your current re-marriage is not fulfilling your lust enough because she wants to remain continent, that’s a valid reason to lust after another’s wife or husband or to force them to submit to you. Its better if you just be realistic and commit adultery in an ongoing fashion in your concrete situation. Divine Laws were made for angels, not real men.

  1. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods.”

The Tenth Commandment forbids the wanting of, or taking someone else’s property. Along with the Seventh Commandment, this commandment condemns theft and the feelings of envy, greed, and jealousy in reaction to what other people have.

But FP is telling us, we can covet them sometimes. Maybe its OK to covet someone’s power and position as well as their goods… Anyway, the best way is to force coercion:  take everything off everyone (except those in power). Enforce Communism! Enshrine Liberation theology. That’s the way to prudently keep that Commandment. Then you won’t have to worry about being too confined in your approach, will you?

Clearly then, the FP  saying what he did about the Commandments, has great consequences. Because lastly, Our Blessed Mother fulfils diligently and perfectly all the Commandments and therefore acts in this ‘confined manner’ and is accused by the FP of lack of courage and going forward. He accuses her of acting wrongly.

In fact I’d say, using that teaching on the Commandments, he accuses Jesus too, St Joseph, all the Saints and all those who try to live God’s Commandments and love their neighbour. They were/are all wrong and, apparently, following their example, stunts our growth!!  In fact, why did God even bother giving The Commandments?

And inscribing them in stone in a holy, miraculous and glorious manner?? 

Apparently it was so that we could tread all over them and break them- not follow them! 

What a hell-ish sermon that is.

What a twisted Gospel.

What a false prophet.

But His Church will be restored and The Commandments too – through Our Lady’s Triumph.

This is the Truth and it must be spoken. It has been brewing within me and the Lord gave me this reading this morning to confirm it:

Shemaiah’s False Prophecy: Jeremiah 29: 24-32 (from )

24 To Shemaiah of Nehelam you shall say: 25 “Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: You have sent letters in your name to all the people who are in Jerusalem, and to Zephaniah the son of Maaseiah the priest, and to all the priests, saying, 26 The Lord has made you priest instead of Jehoiada the priest, to have charge in the House of the Lord, over every madman who prophesies, to put him in the stocks and neck irons. 27 Now why have you not rebuked Jeremiah of Anathoth who is prophesying to you? 28 For he has sent to us in Babylon, saying, Your exile will be long; build houses and live in them, and plant gardens and eat their produce.”

29 Zephaniah the priest read this letter in the hearing of Jeremiah the prophet.

30 Then the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah: 31 “Send to all the exiles, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord concerning Shemaiah of Nehelam: Because Shemaiah had prophesied to you when I did not send him, and has made you trust in a lie, 32 therefore thus says the Lord: Behold, I will punish Shemaiah of Nehelam and his descendants. He shall not have anyone living among this people, and he shall not see the good that I will do to my people, declares the Lord, for he has preached apostasy from the Lord.’

And so we must re-iterate the Word of The Lord and The Ten Commandments at every turn.

Who dares now to listen to and be formed by Francis?

Who dares obey him?

It will be as with Shemaiah.

And if you listen to this False Prophet not sent by God, who has called himself a priest and in charge, in the House of the Lord over Pope Benedictas Shemiaiah did to Jehoiada,  you will be treated as his descendants and not see the good that The Lord has planned.

Jeremiah has warned you this day.

By DonnaLiane

Do Catholics really agree & believe Luther is now ‘a witness to the Gospel’?


pope_and-lutherNo-one who knows the truth about Luther, could make such statements!

The Vatican Document:

On 5 Jan. 2017, LifeSite News reported on the recently released document from the Vatican which was co-authored by the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Christian Unity and the World Council of Churches on the week of prayer from January 18-25:  ‘Week of Prayer for Christian Unity’ – the theme being: Reconciliation: The love of Christ compels us.’

In 2017, it says, “Lutheran and Catholic Christians will for the first time commemorate together the beginning of the Reformation.” The text also states that “Catholics are now able to hear Luther’s challenge for the Church of today, recognizing him as a ‘witness to the gospel.’


“The Lutheran Churchaccepts contraception, abortion, homosexuality, and female clergy, all of which are strictly and unalterably forbidden in the Catholic Church.

…the Vatican is pushing the joint celebration of the Reformation focusing on the common element of “Jesus Christ and his work of reconciliation as the center of Christian faith.” (LifeSite News)

“Actually, The Eucharist is “the source and summit of the Christian life. The other sacraments, and indeed all ecclesiastical ministries and works of the apostolate, are bound up with the Eucharist and are oriented toward it. For in the blessed Eucharist is contained the whole spiritual good of the Church, namely Christ himself, our Pasch.”  (CCC Ch. 1, Article 3 #1324

Lutherans also believe that ‘during the consecration at Mass the bread used becomes the body and blood of Jesus Christ while still looking like bread. Lutherans believe in a fleeting presence – that while Christ is present in the bread during the service, it is just normal bread again outside the service.”

 See complete article at:

Book of Truth Prophecy:

 “The division between the loyal followers, those who accept My Father’s Book, the Most Holy Bible, and those who want to change the Truth, is about to become wider. One half will not deviate from the Truth. The other half will twist the Truth. They will do this to suit their own political and personal motivations, which will be hidden behind a couched language.  (November 21, 2012 )

The Truth about the Eucharist is being very cleverly manipulated. Clever language  is used: Reconciliation: The love of Christ compels us.”

The quote from the Catechism has been changed from “The Eucharist is the source and summit..” to Jesus Christ and his work of reconciliation as the center..Very clever and subversive! It completely changes the meaning, while still bringing to mind ‘Jesus’ and His Mercy in “reconciliation”.


This belief is incompatible with the Catholic Faith; there can be no reconciliation with Lutherans, based on this belief. We would be Judases – betraying Jesus once again. This will simply be another rotten egg thrown into the basket.

(Donna Liane:) “Since when can someone officially call a heretic a “witness to the Gospel” and not fall into grave error themselves???

There was a time when calling a heretic a ‘witness to the Gospel’ also made you a heretic…and in reality it still does, even if it isn’t said officially, for God still notices what men do and say.

It is as impossible for Catholics to commemorate the Reformation, as it would be to celebrate and hold what is Evil as Good. The Reformation is one of the greatest Evils ever committed in history.

O Lord, deliver your people from these evil men who call evil good and good evil.”


Archbishop Mark Coleridge: What is he all about?


220px-mark_coleridgecanberra2011_4043This is the bishop that decided to judge and condemn in an unprecedented way, as soon as he realized Catholics everywhere in this country were reading the messages given through MDM and praying the prayers. He immediately wrote a letter which appeared in every Catholic Church, Catholic newspapers, and read out by parish priests in (in many places with angry sermons) also preached condemning them. This concerted attack was quite unexpected. It was obvious he had not read the messages, nor had the other priests. I made a mental note to keep an eye on him. During the synod, I saw  some of his comments, and since then much has unfolded and is still unfolding, becoming progressively worse.

Just in case, you may still doubt his agenda, see extracts and headlines below:

Headline: Archbishop Coleridge: Adultery is not really Adultery, it “is perhaps too sweeping”

by Remnant Clergy on Biblical False Prophet (20th Oct. 2015)


  • “It’s also clear that those voices, clinging desperately to some imagined or ideologised past, cannot point the way into the future. History will have its way, however much we try to cling to illusions of timelessness.”
  • “ … a second marriage that is enduring and stable and loving, and where there are children who are cared for is not the same as a couple skulking off to a hotel room for a wicked weekend. So, the rubrik “audultery” in one sense is important, but in another sense it doesn’t say enough. And I think what a pastoral approach requires is that we actually enter into what the Synod is calling a “genuine pastoral dialogue of discernment” with these couples…”

Comment: Just in case anyone stands in need of a refresher, let’s review the words of Our Lord: “Whosoever [Latin: Quicumque] shall put away his wife and marry another committeth adultery against her. (Mark 10:11)”

  • “My hope is that we will move towards, without actually accomplishing it this Synod, a genuinely new pastoral approach. Now, at the heart of this, I think there has to be a whole new language”

Comment:He is speaking of changing language in order to bring about a substantial change. He even tells us that the change being sought after is “far from cosmetic”. He is talking – quite plainly, in fact – of preaching a new Word.”

Headline in the American Jesuit Magazine, “The National Catholic Review” on 9th Dec. 2016: Australian Archbishop Says the Church Should Not Strive for “False Clarity” .

  • The article states that “…Archbishop Mark Coleridge of Brisbane, Australia, thinks some of his fellow prelates are afraid of confronting reality.”. Archbishop Coleridge said he agrees with a fellow Aussie, Cardinal George Pell, who said in London recently that some Catholics are “unnerved” by the debate about “Amoris Laetitia.”
  • “I think that’s probably the right word, and I sensed in the words of the four cardinals men who were unnerved,” Archbishop Coleridge said. “Clearly, they had been spoken to by a lot of people who were unnerved. I can understand that.”

Comment: “But where Cardinal Pell went on to suggest the pope needed to offer clarity on the issue, Archbishop Coleridge said Francis is simply acting like a pastor.”


Headline: Conclusions from the Synod on the Family: Brisbane’s Archbishop Coleridge”  

Sunday, October 25, 2015 


  • “Archbishop Coleridge raised ire from some other bishops at the synod when he spoke about divorced and remarried couples and same-sex couples, saying: “I personally think it’s just not in touch with reality to say there is no good in those relationships.”
  • “Archbishop Coleridge has even been described in LGBTQ media as a bishop who gets it.”
  • We weren’t sure whether he (i.e. pope francis at the end of the synod) would back up and speak again at the end of the Synod, …I started taking notes but I thought, “no, no, no, no, no, put the pen down and just listen to what he’s saying”. And as I listened to Pope Francis speak, I thought, “this is the voice of Peter”.
  • It’s either light or darkness, good versus evil, all or nothing, and I just don’t think that’s the way human life works”

Headline on Lifesite News: Synod danger: Changing our language, changing our religion  ROME,

October 24, 2015

  • Archbishop Mark Coleridge of Brisbane, Australia, gave a candid answer at the Vatican press conference on Tuesday to a question posed about the “love the sinner, hate the sin” distinction by LifeSiteNews’ editor-in-chief John-Henry Westen. Coleridge argued that the distinction “no longer communicates” “in the real world” where sexuality is “part of [your] entire being.”
  • “When we say that this or that act is “intrinsically disordered” or evil, we are taken to be saying that the person who commits the act is “intrinsically disordered” or evil. Because sexuality is no longer seen as being a matter of what a person does; it’s seen now as what a person is… So we can no longer condemn the sin but not the sinner.”

And guess what he is planning:


My comment: Remember how before the last 2 synods there was this questionnaire in all the parishes? This was a very clever way of supporting the radical agenda they had in mind for the previous 2 synods. Well, in the last couple of months, we have all had another questionnaire – I imagine it is to be used for this upcoming synod. I guess he wants to be in the fp’s good books!

Headline in LifeSite News 0n August 19, 2016 (Editorial) : The first step needed to get the Church out of the current crisis


  • “There are plans currently underway  for national and diocesan synods on marriage and family based on the controversial Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. While these could, given the ambiguity in the papal exhortation, go either way, seeing who has taken up this proposal gives evidence of a very concerning development.
  • San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy and Brisbane Archbishop Mark Coleridge have both embarked on the synod pathway with McElroy planning his diocesan synod for October and Coleridge planning a national synod for all Australia in 2020. Coleridge said he expects the national synod to address homosexual “marriage” and “ordained ministry” (a likely reference to female clergy), and any other issues of interest”

My comment: Remember how before the last 2 synods there was this questionnaire in all the parishes? Very clever way of supporting the radical agenda they had in mind for the previous two synods. Well, in the last couple of months, we have all had another questionnaire – I imagine it is to be used for this upcoming synod. I guess he wants to impress pf!

The latest horror:

Headline “Catholic archdiocese allows ‘sacrilegious’ semi-nude fashion show in a church – then defends it .

  Thu Dec 15, 2016


  • “The Catholic archdiocese of Brisbane, which is led by Archbishop Mark Coleridge, has defended the staging of a sexually charged, explicitly anti-Christian ballet and fashion show in a Catholic church.
  • Held in St. Patrick’s Church in Fortitude Valley in October 2016, the event included an erotically suggestive ballet performed in front of the high altar in the sanctuary, during which an almost nude man and woman, wearing flesh-toned undergarments, re-enacted the fall of Adam and Eve, …
  • The aisle of St. Patrick’s, a consecrated church in which Mass is held weekly, became the “catwalk” for a fashion show in which models strutted up to the sanctuary to pose before the high altar and tabernacle. In a statement issued on Coleridge’s behalf, archdiocesan spokesperson Aidan Turner asserted “proper precautions” were taken.
  • “The altar and the Blessed Sacrament were moved before the event and returned after it ended”

My comment: The church building and especially the altar are consecrated – it is Sacred space. The fact that the Bl. Sacrament was removed at the time does not take away the blasphemy that occurred in this Sacred Place. It actually seems very ‘pagan’ to me.

Read the complete article at:

The Archbishop’s Advent letter:

Excerpts from “The Flesh and the Facts: An Advent Pastoral letter 2016”

 “…It’s extraordinary to claim that the God whom neither time nor space can contain became a human being at a  particular time and in a particular place. But that’s what we celebrate through Advent and the Christmas season. This puts a bomb under any sense that the material world in general and the flesh in particular are bad. In Genesis we’re told that God saw what he had made and found it very good. ( 1:31). Christmas says that God saw what he had made and, seeing its goodness disfigured, decided to become part of his own creation to restore it to the glory he intended from the beginning….

…The challenge now is not to abandon the faith in favour of the facts, but to create a new engagement of the faith with the culture of which we’re part as the logic of the Incarnation demands….”

… During the Synod process of 2014 and 2015 Pope Francis invited the whole Church to consider marriage and the family in the light of the changed and changing facts. This is a vital area where the split between the Gospel and culture is perhaps more apparent than in other areas of human life. What the Church believes and teaches and what the wider culture thinks and does have been moving in different directions for some time. The Church can’t just look the other way in the belief that the wider culture is doomed. That’s not the Catholic way. We are a Church who, because we take the Incarnation seriously, take culture seriously and seek to engage it as creatively as we can. This means we have to be in touch with reality rather than inhabiting some abstract world which can produce what the Holy Father has called “dry and lifeless doctrine” (Amoris Laetitia, 59) and “a cold, bureaucratic morality” (Amoris Laetitia, 312)….

…Pope Francis has spoken often of the need for the whole Church – not just the pastors – to undergo “a pastoral conversion”. The word “pastoral” can mean many things, but it doesn’t mean that we compromise the truths of the faith. It does mean however that we get in touch with the facts of human experience. It means that we, like God, abandon the world of abstraction to engage the real lives of real people in the ways traced by the Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation, “The Joy of Love”. This will mean a new kind of listening to the truth of people’s experience. From a new listening will come a new language that people can understand because it’s in touch with their lives. That’s what it means to be a truly pastoral Church. It’s also what it means to speak of a new evangelisation by a more missionary Church. …”


‘a bomb under any sense that the material world in general and the flesh in particular are bad.’ Is the Archbishop accusing certain parts of the church of believing that the world and flesh are ‘bad’?– This is far from the truth. True Catholics know that the flesh is not bad, but if it is used contrary to God’s law, evil results, and Grace is lost. When God created the world (Genesis) it was in reality “Good” and pure. Today, we are born, not pure, but tainted with Original sin and a weakness and disposition to sin. We have to confess our sins and have sorrow in order to return to Grace.

‘dry and lifeless doctrine’ – this doctrine, on the contrary, is life-giving – it leads to eternal life. That which is proposed, where there is no sorrow for sins and no change and conforming to God’s law, leads to hell. Jesus forgave the sinful woman, but He said “Go and sin no more.”

engage the real lives of real people in the ways traced by the Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation,’ how about engaging people’s lives in the ways taught by Jesus Christ? God doesn’t change His teachings because people can’t cope. Jesus is God and His teachings are for all time for all people to follow. It’s nonsense to think that people can’t cope – there are people who do – in all sorts of circumstances.

The original letter from Archbishop Mark Coleridge  can be seen below:

Click on the link.



Please pray for all our priests, bishops and cardinals –

that the blind may see the Truth;

and that those who do see, have courage to speak up.


the road to heaven is through the ‘narrow gate’.

If we don’t want to follow God’s Commandments,

then we have no right to be called “Christian”!